Vocal Impact in Patients With Unilateral Diaphragmatic Paralysis.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to investigate the possible vocal impact confirmed by diagnostic tests, the degree of perception of possible vocal impairment by patients with Unilateral Diaphragmatic paralysis (UDP) and its correlation with ventilatory weakness. METHODS: The researchers conducted an analytical, observational and case-control study with 70 individuals, including 35 UDP patients and 35 healthy patients in a control group, who underwent the following assessments: 1) Self-assessment of voice handicap (VHI-10); 2) Self-Assessment of Quality of Life (SF-36); 3) Self-Assessment of Dyspnea (MRC); 4) Objective vocal measures (Maximum Phonation Time (MPT) in /a/, /s/, /z/ and glottal-to-noise excitation ratio); 5) Functional respiratory pressures (Spirometry and maximum ventilatory pressures); 6) General degree of dysphonia - G on the GRBAS Scale. The sex, age and body mass index (BMI) of the individuals were the variables used to match the sample of this study. RESULTS: When compared with controls, patients with UDP had a restrictive functional pattern and inspiratory weakness, with symptoms of dyspnea and worsening quality of life. When associated with a possible vocal impact, these patients had voice handicap and decreased MPT values for all phonemes, especially /a/. There was also a correlation between vocal performance and inspiratory weakness. However, it should be noted that, despite having vocal impairment, many patients did not report the perception of this fact, somehow neglecting such impairment. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to the expected weakness of the ventilatory muscles, patients with UDP had clinically verified vocal impact, and those who had greater inspiratory weakness also had greater voice impairment. Finally, it is relevant that not all patients perceived such vocal impact, which showed a very reduced perception of this impairment in patients with UDP.

Unilateral diaphragmatic paralysis: inspiratory muscles, breathlessness and exercise capacity.

BACKGROUND: Patients with unilateral diaphragmatic paralysis (UDP) may present with dyspnoea without specific cause and limited ability to exercise. We aimed to investigate the diaphragm contraction mechanisms and nondiaphragmatic inspiratory muscle activation during exercise in patients with UDP, compared with healthy individuals. METHODS: Pulmonary function, as well as volitional and nonvolitional inspiratory muscle strength were evaluated in 35 patients and in 20 healthy subjects. Respiratory pressures and electromyography of scalene and sternocleidomastoid muscles were continuously recorded during incremental maximal cardiopulmonary exercise testing until symptom limitation. Dyspnoea was assessed at rest, every 2 min during exercise and at the end of exercise with a modified Borg scale. MAIN RESULTS: Inspiratory muscle strength measurements were significantly lower for patients in comparison to controls (all p<0.05). Patients achieved lower peak of exercise (lower oxygen consumption) compared to controls, with both gastric (-9.8±4.6 cmH2O versus 8.9±6.0 cmH2O) and transdiaphragmatic (6.5±5.5 cmH2O versus 26.9±10.9 cmH2O) pressures significantly lower, along with larger activation of both scalene (40±22% EMGmax versus 18±14% EMGmax) and sternocleidomastoid (34±22% EMGmax versus 14±8% EMGmax). In addition, the paralysis group presented significant differences in breathing pattern during exercise (lower tidal volume and higher respiratory rate) with more dyspnoea symptoms compared to the control group. CONCLUSION: The paralysis group presented with exercise limitation accompanied by impairment in transdiaphragmatic pressure generation and larger accessory inspiratory muscles activation compared to controls, thereby contributing to a neuromechanical dissociation and increased dyspnoea perception.

Assessing the effects of inspiratory muscle training in a patient with unilateral diaphragm dysfunction.

Patients with diaphragm dysfunction experience exertional dyspnoea. Respiratory muscle function assessments can identify breathing abnormalities and IMT might help to reduce symptoms (mostly via improvements in non-diaphragmatic muscles). http://bit.ly/2QdxNFP.

Unilateral diaphragm paralysis: a dysfunction restricted not just to one hemidiaphragm.

BACKGROUND: Most patients with unilateral diaphragm paralysis (UDP) have unexplained dyspnea, exercise limitations, and reduction in inspiratory muscle capacity. We aimed to evaluate the generation of pressure in each hemidiaphragm separately and its contribution to overall inspiratory strength. METHODS: Twenty-seven patients, 9 in right paralysis group (RP) and 18 in left paralysis group (LP), with forced vital capacity (FVC) < 80% pred, and 20 healthy controls (CG), with forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) > 80% pred and FVC > 80% pred, were evaluated for lung function, maximal inspiratory (MIP) and expiratory (MEP) pressure measurements, diaphragm ultrasound, and transdiaphragmatic pressure during magnetic phrenic nerve stimulation (PdiTw). RESULTS: RP and LP had significant inspiratory muscle weakness compared to controls, detected by MIP (- 57.4 ± 16.9 for RP; - 67.1 ± 28.5 for LP and - 103.1 ± 30.4 cmH2O for CG) and also by PdiTW (5.7 ± 4 for RP; 4.8 ± 2.3 for LP and 15.3 ± 5.7 cmH2O for CG). The PdiTw was reduced even when the non-paralyzed hemidiaphragm was stimulated, mainly due to the low contribution of gastric pressure (around 30%), regardless of whether the paralysis was in the right or left hemidiaphragm. On the other hand, in CG, esophagic and gastric pressures had similar contribution to the overall Pdi (around 50%). Comparing both paralyzed and non-paralyzed hemidiaphragms, the mobility during quiet and deep breathing, and thickness at functional residual capacity (FRC) and total lung capacity (TLC), were significantly reduced in paralyzed hemidiaphragm. In addition, thickness fraction was extremely diminished when contrasted with the non-paralyzed hemidiaphragm. CONCLUSIONS: In symptomatic patients with UDP, global inspiratory strength is reduced not only due to weakness in the paralyzed hemidiaphragm but also to impairment in the pressure generated by the non-paralyzed hemidiaphragm.

Accuracy of Invasive and Noninvasive Parameters for Diagnosing Ventilatory Overassistance During Pressure Support Ventilation.

OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the accuracy of criteria for diagnosing pressure overassistance during pressure support ventilation. DESIGN: Prospective clinical study. SETTING: Medical-surgical ICU. PATIENTS: Adults under mechanical ventilation for 48 hours or more using pressure support ventilation and without any sedative for 6 hours or more. Overassistance was defined as the occurrence of work of breathing less than 0.3 J/L or 10% or more of ineffective inspiratory effort. Two alternative overassistance definitions were based on the occurrence of inspiratory esophageal pressure-time product of less than 50 cm H2O s/min or esophageal occlusion pressure of less than 1.5 cm H2O. INTERVENTIONS: The pressure support was set to 20 cm H2O and decreased in 3-cm H2O steps down to 2 cm H2O. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The following parameters were evaluated to diagnose overassistance: respiratory rate, tidal volume, minute ventilation, peripheral arterial oxygen saturation, rapid shallow breathing index, heart rate, mean arterial pressure, change in esophageal pressure during inspiration, and esophageal and airway occlusion pressure. In all definitions, the respiratory rate had the greatest accuracy for diagnosing overassistance (receiver operating characteristic area = 0.92; 0.91 and 0.76 for work of breathing, pressure-time product and esophageal occlusion pressure in definition, respectively) and always with a cutoff of 17 incursions per minute. In all definitions, a respiratory rate of less than or equal to 12 confirmed overassistance (100% specificity), whereas a respiratory rate of greater than or equal to 30 excluded overassistance (100% sensitivity). CONCLUSION: A respiratory rate of 17 breaths/min is the parameter with the greatest accuracy for diagnosing overassistance. Respiratory rates of less than or equal to 12 or greater than or equal to 30 are useful clinical references to confirm or exclude pressure support overassistance.